OFFLINE

blah blah blah blah...it's not that...girls also have to convince guys many times...and girls also wants sex equally as much as guy do...
SO STOP BEING UNFAIR AND PARTIAL AND CHANGE THE DAMN TERMINOLOGIES!!!

OFFLINE

You guys might also want to read:
http://apps.facebook.com/facebook_forums/read.php?lang=1&t=t&id=263

OFFLINE

One Word:

FEMINISM

the art of destroying the everything in a man's nature and his masculine principle by perpetually painting them as some type of constant evil, looming, sex-lustful predator evermore plotting on which ways he can "get over" on the innocent, dainty, angelic, harmless female.

Basically its a way of shunning men from their natural desires, of admiring and wanting to be close to a woman.

Men are persecuted for being men, nowadays in said society.

OFFLINE

Your views on sex are entirely wrong, my friend. It's not 'considered' that anyone is giving, nor receiving anything. Sex is an experience that two people share.

In a biological term, a guy is the one 'giving'. Considering he has the sperm. The girl is 'receiving'. Considering she's the one with the essential component to create a child.

This is all about opinion, and not facts. It depends on how you look at it. It's not always considered that anyone is receiving, or giving anything.

Like I said - Sex is something that two people share, and should not be portrayed as a 'trade', as you made it sound.

OFFLINE

Dude, I'm not saying either it's about giving or receiving. Infact it's me who started this thread that's it's not giving or receiving..."why the hell it is considered that the guy has gotten something and the girls has given something"!!! Is something wrong with your grammer?

OFFLINE

If anyone's having issues with grammar, It's you.

"The guy has gotten something". < "The guy is receiving / has received something".
"The girl has given something". < "The girl is giving something".

It's all common sense, really. But I can see that you lack in the field of knowledge. I simply worded it different, and you're assuming that my grammar is "wrong".

I understood what you said the first time. If anything, I was agreeing with you. Except I put it into terms that people could fully understand. Unlike your incomprehensible paragraphs.

If I had to shed some insight on the topic, I'd probably have to assume that It has something to do with gender itself. Man has always been superseding the women. For every dollar that men make, women receive 75¢. For generations, It's always been understood that man has been "on top", for lack of a better term.

Men could vote, when women couldn't. The ratio of pay between men and women isn't aligned, and women have a less chance of being hired, simply because their women.

When the facts are directly in front of you, It's kind of difficult not to realize that men have always been higher up. Women have always been made out to be the weaker character.

I guess people are facing the inevitable realization that men are always going to be dominant. They always have been with everything else, so why not sex?

OFFLINE

"Your views on sex are entirely wrong", this is what you said. If this is way of expressing you're agreement with the sentence, you might need to go back to school.

OFFLINE

Dumbshit.


............................................________
....................................,.-'"...................``~.,
.............................,.-"..................................."-.,
.........................,/...............................................":,
.....................,?......................................................\,
.................../...........................................................,}
................./......................................................,:`^`..}
.............../...................................................,:"........./
..............?.....__.........................................:`.........../
............./__.(....."~-,_..............................,:`........../
.........../(_...."~,_........"~,_....................,:`........_/
..........{.._$;_......"=,_......."-,_.......,.-~-,},.~";/....}
...........((.....*~_......."=-._......";,,./`..../"............../
...,,,___.\`~,......"~.,....................`.....}............../
............(....`=-,,.......`........................(......;_,,-"
............/.`~,......`-...............................\....../\
.............\`~.*-,.....................................|,./.....\,__
,,_..........}.>-._\...................................|..............`=~-,
.....`=~-,_\_......`\,.................................\
...................`=~-,,.\,...............................\
................................`:,,...........................`\..............__
.....................................`=-,...................,%`>--==``
........................................_\..........._,-%.......`\
...................................,

OFFLINE

Biology lesson here: sex creates children. Shocking, I know.

Who bears the child? (Don't worry, I'll answer for you.) Women do.

What you have to take into account is that pregnancy as a biological function uses up a tremendous amount of energy and resources, and that's to say nothing of actual child rearing. When a woman becomes pregnant she's pretty much stuck with it (barring abortion), where as a man can dip his doodle and be down the road in a sleazy bar the next night trying to get some action from a different pretty, young thing. It happens a lot, believe me.

The perception of "giving" and "taking" then becomes a product of evolution. That's why this idea extends to pretty much all cultures uniformly. What is the woman giving? She's giving the man her promise that she'll give her time and resources to the child. What is the man taking? He's taking that promise with no guarentee that he'll be around to help out.

So what about people who are married? Well, they have obviously agreed to have that child, and raise it together. And what is the perception that society has about their sex? Is it the same as their perception as sex between unmarried people? I'll let you answer that for yourselves.

And what about contraception? Well, see, prophylactics are actually a fairly new invention considering that mankind has been around for roughly 100,000 years. It's going to take a bit more than a millimeters thick sheath of rubber over your whoody-who to override tens of thousands of years of biological instinct.

I hope that clears a few things up.