OFFLINE

Obama is playing everyone with this Libya deal. He never wanted to be on record as wanting to eliminate Gaddafi. He only wants to seem like it to certain people, but wants clear evidence that he is not after the death of or capture of Gaddafi to show the rank and file Muslim. Example: Obama repeating the statement that Gaddafi "has to go". If Obama wanted any more, it would be caught and brought to justice, or eliminated, or even replaced.

Obama has connections to Gaddafi through Rev. Wright and Luis Farrakhan, and supports Gaddafi unless a more hardline Muslim can take power. This is in keeping with Obama's lack of support of Mobarak of Egypt, and Obama's recognition of the Muslim Brotherhood in the Egyptian governmental process.

Given that there are known elements of Al Quidea and the MB in Libya in opposition to Gaddafi, and the US is interceding on behalf of all rebels, and supports them over Gaddafi, makes it seem that Obama does not know what he is doing. That, to me is a wrong assumption. It is like Glenn Beck warns, watch the other hand! Obama only supports the rebels over Gaddafi if there is a chance that more hardline Muslims can seize power without Obama being perceived as influencing that occurrence in the western world.

Obama has made no statements regarding the affiliations of the rebel groups in Libya, not even an acknowledgement there are rebel forces there. He does not want us to focus on the rebels agenda. And it is not a humanitarian need issue either. There are nations with far more severe issues such as the Sudan, where humanitarian need is needed more and more easily justified.
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=278685 claims there is a Soros connection to the Libyan bombings. If Soros is involved, be assured there is a monetary reason for his involvement.
There are too many contradictions with what Obama is, and is not saying, regarding Libya. It is all carefully scripted, and that script is strictly followed, including the WH press secretary, Hillary Clinton, and by the military. Much of what has been said in the last month directly contradicts Obama's own previous positions.

But things begin to be sensible if one looks at ulterior motives:
>Obama can boost hardline Muslims in Libya, and possibly put them in charge there, without being linked to that result directly. That includes the Libyan banking system with the billions that Gaddafi has stashed there. Those billions can fund a lot of terrorist related actions. It may even be a large enough boost that Muslim Caliphate could arise.

>Obama can claim to be a humanitarian.

>Obama can make us appear to be imperialistic aggressors in the eyes of many around the world, further weakening our status.

>Obama can make the economic situation in Libya favorable to Soros's money making schemes.

>Obama can spend more of our tax money, getting us further in debt.

Soros fingerprints on Libya bombing
www.wnd.com
George Soros Philanthropist billionaire George Soros is a primary funder and key proponent of the global organization that promotes the military doctrine used by the Obama administration to justify the recent airstrikes targeting the regime of Moamma... http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=278685

OFFLINE

GREAT POST REX!!!! If people were in doubt at one time, this leaves a very small margin of error, if any at all.  There is nothing that cannot be proved at this point, that Obama and Soro's are working towards an internal plan of World dominance. An Islamic agenda that's being played out very well while America sits back like sheep.  Wow, this is tying together quite well.  Beck mentioned Cass Sunsteins wife today and her role in the recent attacks. If America's Congress does not step in at this point, I'm afraid there will be NO turning back. May God help the USA!!