Philosophy of Astrology > Discussions
Some questions . . . [Lorenzo Dello Smerillo]
Page 1 / 1
Some questions . . . [Lorenzo Dello Smerillo]
05/21/2011 12:22 am

Administrator
Junior Member


Regist.: 05/20/2011
Topics: 6
Posts: 0
OFFLINE
Some questions for those who would be prone, even ever so slightly, or not, to think that houses, signs, rulers, exaltations and other semiotic indicators (syllables or words or perhaps even sylabubs or sylphids) used in the Fundamentalist sacred dogmas of Hellenistic and Mediaeval (Sassanian, Arabic, Hindian, Hamster etc) astrological theologies are valid, true and pragmatic [ e.g., " IT WORKS" ] :

1. What is the physical dimension of any sign?

2. Where is it located?

3. What happens when a space craft crosses from one sign to another?

4. What is observed by the space craft sensors?

5. Of what physical material does a sign consist?

6. What is the physical reason which underpins the rationality of the dogma of "rulership"?

7. Why do planets rule signs and not signs planets?

8. Can "rulership" change?

9. By what physical process exactly?

10. How many planets are there?

11. If the y is not an x, why is Venus not Uranus?

12 Is there exact mathematically precise order in the solar system of planets? Why?

13. Why are "houses" not trees and not tents or caves or boats?

14. Why are there 12 signs?

15. Why are there 12 houses?

16 Why not 8, 32, 16 or 360 or an infinite number?

17. Before signs were used, what were they?

18. Who discovered the "signs"? How, when, where?

19. Why are there 360 degrees in celestial arc measurement and not 365 or 364 or just 53?

20. If signs can be divided into decans, why not into sexans or septans?
What effect does this have on rulerships?

21. Is bubble gum used to fix the fixed stars or something else?

22. Can fixed stars rule houses, or signs? Or only fixed signs?
Is so, why? If not, why? What are the physical reasons for this?

Bonus question:

23. The arc measurement of the apparent disc of the Sun is x minutes and the measurement of the lunar disc apparent width is y minutes, where both x and y > 1. When the sun or moon, apparently "move" into sign z or p, as disc measurement is greater than 1 arc minute, when is the "in" moment defined; when a fraction of the apparent disc measurement is "in" sign p or when the whole of the apparent disc measurement is "in" p?
How does this Moment of Astrology affect, change or modify the ruler of Sun or Lune?

Answers can be written either in English or Latin.
Quote   
Page 1 / 1
Login with Facebook to post
Preview