| 02/01/2011 7:39 pm |
 NEWBIE

Regist.: 02/01/2011 Topics: 3 Posts: 0
| Please take a moment to let us know what image editing programs you have/use.
~ For beginners, this will also help us with any questions you may have. |
|
|
| 03/05/2011 12:17 pm |

Regist.: 03/04/2011 Topics: 18446744073709551615 Posts: 4294967255
| I'm using an old version of Photoshop (5 I think) that I acquired when I first purchased my (very aging) computer back in 2003. Unfortunately I've never really explored this software's true capabilities and I'm sure it's changed a lot in the past several years. To date, there hasn't been too much I've done with it. I primarily use it for Scanning, Cropping, Screen Dumps, and converting certain pics to gray scale. (for some reason, I love gray scale photography).
Anywho, I use (again, old) a program called ACDSee for general picture viewing and printing. The picture software that came with my Kodak camera years ago, don't remember what it was called, is the WORST piece of software I've ever seen, and ACDSee has been my Power Rook for basic picture functions. |
|
|
| 07/15/2011 8:48 am |
 NEWBIE

Regist.: 07/15/2011 Topics: 0 Posts: 1
| Heya howdy high.
Have been using various imaging programs throughout the continuing advent of digital imaging. Started with C= Amiga computers and software, including all things NewTek VideoToaster. 720x480 image of less than one meg size was sufficiant back then. How times have changed...
Current imaging programs used to process my photography consist of:
(duh) Photoshop, current version and v5.5 for image manipulation. Who needs a real darkroom anymore eh?
HP ScanJet4850 craptastic scanner software. 35mm negatives scanned in at a minimum of 25 megs in size.
FastStone Image Viewer for image viewing and cataloging. (checking out Lightroom as an alternative)
EPSON 9600 printer drivers and utilities for the beast of an output device to complete the cycle of image capture to tacking a print on the wall.
While I do not have a modern digital SLR to replace the aging 35mm camera, there are years of negatives tucked into shoeboxes waiting to "see the light" so to speak. The digital snapshot camera works quite well in most instances, however I still use the 35mm for most of my work.
...which can be viewed here-> http://www.rcfreas.com/ |
................ http://www.rcfreas.com/files/cafesig.jpg
|