Page 1 / 1
iceland
08/22/2011 6:40 am

Forum Expert


Regist.: 11/17/2010
Topics: 131
Posts: 466
OFFLINE
Why Iceland Should Be in the News, But Is Not
By Deena Stryker

An Italian radio program's story about Iceland’s on-going revolution is a stunning example of how little our media tells us about the rest of the world. Americans may remember that at the start of the 2008 financial crisis, Iceland literally went bankrupt.  The reasons were mentioned only in passing, and since then, this little-known member of the European Union fell back into oblivion.
As one European country after another fails or risks failing, imperiling the Euro, with repercussions for the entire world, the last thing the powers that be want is for Iceland to become an example. Here's why:
Five years of a pure neo-liberal regime had made Iceland, (population 320 thousand, no army), one of the richest countries in the world. In 2003 all the country’s banks were privatized, and in an effort to attract foreign investors, they offered on-line banking whose minimal costs allowed them to offer relatively high rates of return. The accounts, called IceSave, attracted many English and Dutch small investors.  But as investments grew, so did the banks’ foreign debt.  In 2003 Iceland’s debt was equal to 200 times its GNP, but in 2007, it was 900 percent.  The 2008 world financial crisis was the coup de grace. The three main Icelandic banks, Landbanki, Kapthing and Glitnir, went belly up and were nationalized, while the Kroner lost 85% of its value with respect to the Euro.  At the end of the year Iceland declared bankruptcy.
Contrary to what could be expected, the crisis resulted in Icelanders recovering their sovereign rights, through a process of direct participatory democracy that eventually led to a new Constitution.  But only after much pain.
Geir Haarde, the Prime Minister of a Social Democratic coalition government, negotiated a two million one hundred thousand dollar loan, to which the Nordic countries added another two and a half million. But the foreign financial community pressured Iceland to impose drastic measures.  The FMI and the European Union wanted to take over its debt, claiming this was the only way for the country to pay back Holland and Great Britain, who had promised to reimburse their citizens.
Protests and riots continued, eventually forcing the government to resign. Elections were brought forward to April 2009, resulting in a left-wing coalition which condemned the neoliberal economic system, but immediately gave in to its demands that Iceland pay off a total of three and a half million Euros.  This required each Icelandic citizen to pay 100 Euros a month (or about $130) for fifteen years, at 5.5% interest, to pay off a debt incurred by private parties vis a vis other private parties. It was the straw that broke the reindeer’s back.
What happened next was extraordinary. The belief that citizens had to pay for the mistakes of a financial monopoly, that an entire nation must be taxed to pay off private debts was shattered, transforming the relationship between citizens and their political institutions and eventually driving Iceland’s leaders to the side of their constituents. The Head of State, Olafur Ragnar Grimsson, refused to ratify the law that would have made Iceland’s citizens responsible for its bankers’ debts, and accepted calls for a referendum.
Of course the international community only increased the pressure on Iceland. Great Britain and Holland threatened dire reprisals that would isolate the country.  As Icelanders went to vote, foreign bankers threatened to block any aid from the IMF.  The British government threatened to freeze Icelander savings and checking accounts. As Grimsson said: “We were told that if we refused the international community’s conditions, we would become the Cuba of the North.  But if we had accepted, we would have become the Haiti of the North.” (How many times have I written that when Cubans see the dire state of their neighbor, Haiti, they count themselves lucky.)
In the March 2010 referendum, 93% voted against repayment of the debt.  The IMF immediately froze its loan.  But the revolution (though not televised in the United States), would not be intimidated. With the support of a furious citizenry, the government launched civil and penal investigations into those responsible for the financial crisis.  Interpol put out an international arrest warrant for the ex-president of Kaupthing, Sigurdur Einarsson, as the other bankers implicated in the crash fled the country.
But Icelanders didn't stop there: they decided to draft a new constitution that would free the country from the exaggerated power of international finance and virtual money.  (The one in use had been written when Iceland gained its independence from Denmark, in 1918, the only difference with the Danish constitution being that the word ‘president’ replaced the word ‘king’.)
To write the new constitution, the people of Iceland elected twenty-five citizens from among 522 adults not belonging to any political party but recommended by at least thirty citizens. This document was not the work of a handful of politicians, but was written on the internet. The constituent’s meetings are streamed on-line, and citizens can send their comments and suggestions, witnessing the document as it takes shape. The constitution that eventually emerges from this participatory democratic process will be submitted to parliament for approval after the next elections.
Some readers will remember that Iceland’s ninth century agrarian collapse was featured in Jared Diamond’s book by the same name. Today, that country is recovering from its financial collapse in ways just the opposite of those generally considered unavoidable, as confirmed yesterday by the new head of the IMF, Christine Lagarde to Fareed Zakaria. The people of Greece have been told that the privatization of their public sector is the only solution.  And those of Italy, Spain and Portugal are facing the same threat.
They should look to Iceland. Refusing to bow to foreign interests, that small country stated loud and clear that the people are sovereign.    
That’s why it is not in the news anymore.

http://sacsis.org.za/site/article/728.1?frommailing=1
Quote   
08/22/2011 9:05 pm

Forum Fanatic


Regist.: 04/10/2011
Topics: 12
Posts: 284
OFFLINE


To write the new constitution, the people of Iceland elected twenty-five citizens from among 522 adults not belonging to any political party but recommended by at least thirty citizens. This document was not the work of a handful of politicians, but was written on the internet. The constituent’s meetings are streamed on-line, and citizens can send their comments and suggestions, witnessing the document as it takes shape. The constitution that eventually emerges from this participatory democratic process will be submitted to parliament for approval after the next elections.



I like this. I wish tUSA weren't so big. This is the way to go, but it wouldn't work in more populous nations......especially where, like tUSA, there is so many areas that want nothing to do with other areas of the country. If a meltdown like this ever happened here (or should I say when) you will see this country fracture into at least three (if not four) smaller nations.
Quote   
08/23/2011 5:45 am

Forum Expert


Regist.: 11/17/2010
Topics: 131
Posts: 466
OFFLINE

Originally Posted by Mark Simmons:

I like this. I wish tUSA weren't so big. This is the way to go, but it wouldn't work in more populous nations......



Isn't just the population, is the general demographic of ppl who use online forums.....  AFAIK Obama tried a big online forum/Q&A session just after he became prez, to get suggestions from the public on how to implement his "open government" promise (yeah, we wont' bother going into how that went...). Most of the top questions ended up being from ppl who wanted to legalize marijuana or wanted to know the truth about UFOs and Area 51... And us Irish know how easy it is to ballot-stuff an online poll - a few years ago we got "A Nation Once Again" voted as the world's top song on a BBC online poll (just beating some indian song no-one had ever heard of - they weren't as good at ballot stuffing as we were) :-P

http://irishecho.com/?p=55556  


If a meltdown like this ever happened here (or should I say when) you will see this country fracture into at least three (if not four) smaller nations.



What, like this?





(and I didn't pick the names so don't give out to me... :-P)
Quote   
08/23/2011 9:30 am

Forum Expert


Regist.: 02/20/2011
Topics: 132
Posts: 521
OFFLINE
I think Arizona would go with Redneckistan.  Have no clue about New Mexico.
Quote   
08/23/2011 12:22 pm

Moderator
Administrator
Senior Forum Expert


Regist.: 11/17/2010
Topics: 296
Posts: 1121
OFFLINE
put it this way, if a fracture were to occur, i'd rather be no other place than IN redneckistan.
................
Whatever's Clever
Quote   
08/23/2011 9:26 pm

Forum Fanatic


Regist.: 04/10/2011
Topics: 12
Posts: 284
OFFLINE

Originally Posted by Bryant Platt:
I think Arizona would go with Redneckistan.  Have no clue about New Mexico.



Nah, Arizona, Cali, New Mexico and parts of Colorado, Utah, and Texas would all become the new New Mexico.

I don't think we would let places like Wyoming and Montana into Redneckistan unless they made it easier to get elk tags.
Quote   
08/23/2011 9:27 pm

Forum Fanatic


Regist.: 04/10/2011
Topics: 12
Posts: 284
OFFLINE

Originally Posted by Dødherre Mørktre:
put it this way, if a fracture were to occur, i'd rather be no other place than IN redneckistan.



Can I get a HELL YEAH!!!

Better than Fruit-n-nutica
Quote   
08/23/2011 9:30 pm

Forum Fanatic


Regist.: 04/10/2011
Topics: 12
Posts: 284
OFFLINE

Originally Posted by Kieran Colfer:

Isn't just the population, is the general demographic of ppl who use online forums.....  AFAIK Obama tried a big online forum/Q&A session just after he became prez, to get suggestions from the public on how to implement his "open government" promise (yeah, we wont' bother going into how that went...). Most of the top questions ended up being from ppl who wanted to legalize marijuana or wanted to know the truth about UFOs and Area 51... And us Irish know how easy it is to ballot-stuff an online poll - a few years ago we got "A Nation Once Again" voted as the world's top song on a BBC online poll (just beating some indian song no-one had ever heard of - they weren't as good at ballot stuffing as we were) :-P


So how is Iceland solving those issues. Are they somehow more civilized and serious than the rest of us???

  


What, like this?





(and I didn't pick the names so don't give out to me... :-P)



Not at all. It was this brand smartassity that was missing.
Quote   
Page 1 / 1
Login with Facebook to post
Preview