WC > Whatevers Clever
Complex Eyes, the "Cambrian Explosion," and Creationism
Page 2 / 2 1 - 2 « previous
Complex Eyes, the "Cambrian Explosion," and Creationism
07/24/2011 8:45 pm

Moderator
Administrator
Senior Forum Expert


Regist.: 11/17/2010
Topics: 296
Posts: 1121
OFFLINE

Originally Posted by Bryant Platt:
The only ones who have to fear science wiping them off the face of the earth are fundamentalists who believe in a literal reading of the bible, and they've been on a slow decline for centuries.



see, why's this gotta be about the bible? what are you racist or something? why couldn't you have said, "The only ones who have to fear science wiping them off the face of the earth are literalists, who believe in the literal reading of religious texts, and they've been on a slow decline for centuries."?
................
Whatever's Clever
Quote   
07/24/2011 10:43 pm

Forum Expert


Regist.: 02/20/2011
Topics: 132
Posts: 521
OFFLINE

Originally Posted by Dødherre Mørktre:

Originally Posted by Bryant Platt:
The only ones who have to fear science wiping them off the face of the earth are fundamentalists who believe in a literal reading of the bible, and they've been on a slow decline for centuries.



see, why's this gotta be about the bible? what are you racist or something? why couldn't you have said, "The only ones who have to fear science wiping them off the face of the earth are literalists, who believe in the literal reading of religious texts, and they've been on a slow decline for centuries."?



I never realized that fundamentalist Christians were a race.  I've never met or heard of a fundamentalist Buddhist, Hindu, or Shintoist.  Islam was once much more excepting of science than it now is, so to claim that fundamentalism in Islam is in decline is not historically correct.
Quote   
07/25/2011 7:02 pm

Moderator
Administrator
Senior Forum Expert


Regist.: 11/17/2010
Topics: 296
Posts: 1121
OFFLINE
uhh...okay. well i was just kidding, but ii guess you're saying that only christianity has its share of fundamentalists, and that somehow those fundamentalists represent christendom?
................
Whatever's Clever
Quote   
07/26/2011 12:35 pm

Forum Fanatic


Regist.: 04/10/2011
Topics: 12
Posts: 284
OFFLINE

Originally Posted by Dødherre Mørktre:
uhh...okay. well i was just kidding, but ii guess you're saying that only christianity has its share of fundamentalists, and that somehow those fundamentalists represent christendom?



Actually I think he mentioned Christians and only Christians because of the makeup of this group. No reason to mention any other religion since they are not represented here. No harm, no foul really.
Quote   
07/26/2011 2:30 pm

Forum Expert


Regist.: 11/17/2010
Topics: 131
Posts: 466
OFFLINE

Originally Posted by Mark Simmons:

Actually I think he mentioned Christians and only Christians because of the makeup of this group. No reason to mention any other religion since they are not represented here. No harm, no foul really.



What if I said I was a pastafarian? ;-P
Quote   
07/26/2011 2:44 pm

Forum Expert


Regist.: 02/20/2011
Topics: 132
Posts: 521
OFFLINE

Originally Posted by Kieran Colfer:

Originally Posted by Mark Simmons:

Actually I think he mentioned Christians and only Christians because of the makeup of this group. No reason to mention any other religion since they are not represented here. No harm, no foul really.



What if I said I was a pastafarian? ;-P



Hey, all us pastafarians want are for schools to teach the controversy. That in addition to teaching evolution, young students should also be taught that the FSM created the earth, a mountain, some trees, and a  midgit [sic] on the first day, rested for three days, then created the rest of the universe and non-midgit [sic] humans in the modern form, and then rested for an additional three days.
Quote   
07/27/2011 7:36 am

Forum Expert


Regist.: 11/17/2010
Topics: 131
Posts: 466
OFFLINE

Originally Posted by Bryant Platt:

Originally Posted by Kieran Colfer:

Hey, all us pastafarians want are for schools to teach the controversy. That in addition to teaching evolution, young students should also be taught that the FSM created the earth, a mountain, some trees, and a  midgit [sic] on the first day, rested for three days, then created the rest of the universe and non-midgit [sic] humans in the modern form, and then rested for an additional three days.



but that's what happened, so how is it controversial?
Quote   
Page 2 / 2 1 - 2 « previous
Login with Facebook to post
Preview