| 09/20/2011 10:12 pm |
 Forum Addict

Regist.: 09/15/2011 Topics: 38 Posts: 37
 OFFLINE | what you think of people useing 50 cal in woodsball? |
................ philmckool
|
| 09/24/2011 1:22 am |
 Cool Senior Member

Regist.: 09/24/2011 Topics: 4 Posts: 79
 OFFLINE | Probably not going to happen that much. It was said to be the next greatest things, its dead here. You have a better chance of people having .43 than having .50cal. |
|
|
| 09/24/2011 2:13 pm |
 Forum Addict

Regist.: 09/15/2011 Topics: 38 Posts: 37
 OFFLINE | Originally Posted by Steven Campbell: Probably not going to happen that much. It was said to be the next greatest things, its dead here. You have a better chance of people having .43 than having .50cal.
i seen 50 cals being used not 45s snice they dont got to far or feel them |
................ philmckool
|
| 09/25/2011 5:43 am |
 Cool Senior Member

Regist.: 09/24/2011 Topics: 4 Posts: 79
 OFFLINE | Originally Posted by Philip Thomas John Marshall: i seen 50 cals being used not 45s snice they dont got to far or feel them
.50 cal for the most part has been rejected by the community. Even at the beginning of the .50 cal different paintball manufacturers stated that they were not going to even make a marker capable of shooting .50 cal paintballs.
The appeal of .50 cal is the smaller size and less paint but larger size that the .43 cal so you get a bit more range.
I really don't see .50 cal catching on past that as how many people are going to give up their $1000 markers to get a .50 cal marker that very few make. |
|
|
| 09/26/2011 12:10 pm |
 Forum Addict

Regist.: 09/15/2011 Topics: 38 Posts: 37
 OFFLINE | Originally Posted by Steven Campbell:
Originally Posted by Philip Thomas John Marshall: i seen 50 cals being used not 45s snice they dont got to far or feel them
.50 cal for the most part has been rejected by the community. Even at the beginning of the .50 cal different paintball manufacturers stated that they were not going to even make a marker capable of shooting .50 cal paintballs.
The appeal of .50 cal is the smaller size and less paint but larger size that the .43 cal so you get a bit more range.
I really don't see .50 cal catching on past that as how many people are going to give up their $1000 markers to get a .50 cal marker that very few make.
45 cal are smaller then 50 cal |
................ philmckool
|
| 09/26/2011 12:21 pm |
 Cool Senior Member

Regist.: 09/24/2011 Topics: 4 Posts: 79
 OFFLINE | Originally Posted by Philip Thomas John Marshall: 45 cal are smaller then 50 cal
.45 cal is smaller than .50 cal but then again they don't make a .45 for paintball so I'm sure why you keep calling a .43 cal paintball a .45 cal?
And I was stating that .50 is bigger than .43 cal.
|
|
|
| 09/30/2011 10:59 am |
 NEWBIE

Regist.: 09/20/2011 Topics: 0 Posts: 2
 OFFLINE | Iv never heard of a 43 cal. its a 45 cal so why say 43 when there is no such cal. |
|
|
| 09/30/2011 12:15 pm |
 Cool Senior Member

Regist.: 09/24/2011 Topics: 4 Posts: 79
 OFFLINE | Originally Posted by Larry Solt: Iv never heard of a 43 cal. its a 45 cal so why say 43 when there is no such cal.
I have one of each of these pistols, they are .43 cal and yes it does exist:
http://www.kingmantraining.com/section/products/index.html
RAP4 also has their .43 mag fed markers with actual casings that can eject after each shot. |
|
|
| 10/01/2011 8:56 am |
 NEWBIE

Regist.: 09/20/2011 Topics: 0 Posts: 2
 OFFLINE | 43 cal. must be paintball only |
|
|
| 10/01/2011 12:25 pm |
 Cool Senior Member

Regist.: 09/24/2011 Topics: 4 Posts: 79
 OFFLINE | Originally Posted by Larry Solt: 43 cal. must be paintball only
This is a paintball forum and the topic of this thread is about paintballs. |
|
|